Spurs Defeated By Detroit

January 12, 2006 Detroit 83 over San Antonio 68

The Spurs were defeated by the Pistons for the second time this season, last night. This time the Pistons did it at San Antonio and showed the Spurs their weaknesses. The weak link being of course Tony Parker’s lack of defense against a dynamic back court. Detroit did shut down Parker in the paint, leaving him to settle for outside shots which Parker seemed hesitant to take. The Spurs bench who is usually very impressive against weak defensive teams, was ineffective and could not change the pace of the game. However, Manu Ginobli still played impressively and proved why he is the most important player on the Spurs team after their big man Duncon. Without Manu, the Spurs are static and boring.

On the other end, the Pistons executed very well, by setting up Rasheed Wallace, their most valuable player in my opinion. Rasheed posted on Tim Duncon with ease and then later settled for three pointers (which make Rasheed almost unstoppable). Billups did not take over the game last night, instead Prince and Hamilton were the offensive threats (after Rasheed). This was great because in the previous game Chauncey had hogged the ball too much and did not let the rest of the team get into the game. Last night though, Chauncey gave up the ball throughout the game and let his teammates score. This gave the Spurs trouble on the defensive end, as they could not stop Rasheed or Prince, and when it came to Hamilton, I am not sure why they put Parker on him in the second half. Parker is a terrible defender. Bowen is much more effective and he even scored last night (and not off three pointers)! The bench played equally well for Detroit, as Saunders chose to mix up the starters and bench so that most everyone got some minutes in. From the way the Pistons played, it was obvious that their bench was comfortable and knew exactly how they needed to execute.

Last night’s game prove why the Pistons are the number one team this season (on both ends of the court) and just how weak the Spurs are.

Intellectual Brilliance Without Bias

In this age of rampant blogging and opinionated writers, would-be journalists, and snob professionals, it makes me wonder if we Americans can count beyond three. Lets face it, Microsoft Word and Powerpoint have done more than enabled us to make our points, they have also ruined our fluid expression and made it conform to nothing more than a heading followed by three points of emphasis. Great intellectual thought somehow escapes us, the story becomes reduced, the points alas irrelevant or worse: redundant and boring. Let me think for a minute, do we know what good writing is anymore? Perhaps we need to remember?

Stranger In A Strange Land

What comes to mind is The American, that novel by Henry James. Before Jerry Seinfeld’s Newman, there was Christopher Newman. The New World Man. Yes, that is also a great Rush song, but I still prefer Subdivisions, but New World Man does indeed summarize the character Christopher Newman. Imagine the mythical man, The American, a man of nature, of wealth, of strength, of careless mind, and powerful will: a noble man, but not of cautious mind. A great character? Yes.

Though, A better intellectual author is what concerns me now. Henry James does something which we forget too often today, which is to not take sides. Too often we confront issues from the beginning from unfounded facts and personal bias than from pure intellectual neutrality. In The American, Henry James describes a social world in which right and wrong has no favorites, everyone has faults and admirable traits. Reality is often grounded in complexities that lead to interesting arguments, or at least humorous irony. You love her, but she loves you not, you hate her, and yet she still loves you more. Obsession, desperation, inspiration, tragedy, for all romance is irony.

You Do Not Talk About Fight Club!

And I wanted to smash his beautiful face to pieces as well. If you watched the film Fight Club, or better yet read book, it comes to mind. You need to feel it, see it, sweat and bleed the same space. Form your own conclusions, but do not just take some pseudo-intellectual’s word for it. Be there in the moment and live it as they say. I have watched too many pundits on cable news shout louder and louder to make me believe they know what they are talking about. But that is not news, that is not brilliant intellectual thought, that is just some guy speaking louder, making me think that because he acts mad it must be true. But they have never been to Fight Club, they have never bothered to show up and pick their man out, stood there shaking, holding their fists up, getting ready to be beaten senseless for the next three to five minutes. Good intellectuals, be it writers, painters, or performance artists describe the world to us, they do not sit there and preach to us as if we were watching television or did not know how to read the book of Genesis ourselves.

Great art, great thought is not about passionate belief, it is about describing the world, perhaps it is never our world, but it is a world, and if we see it without bias, without stupidity, and have the fortitude to have the vision ourselves, then perhaps I will think that I have not wasted my time.

Think It Over

It’s no secret why I’m standing here.
That you never notice these hands
which have been open and bare
without hesitation, without redemption.

I am yours and no, there is no other.

My wicked thoughts, have layed me
upon this turbelent storm,
And the breach is now ten miles wide
and between us.

Hurts -I know,
to know what I’ve done to us.
Now that you are confused and vulnerable
You’re not sure what I mean anymore.

Is this who we really are?
Or can we forgive a little more?
And try to not wonder anymore
what we did and didn’t say?

And it’s no secret why
I’m still standing here,
Never so open and bare
Vulnerable and confused.

Still thinking it isn’t over.